Dog Related News

Champions and BOB winners in 15 breeds to be health checked by the KC Club

Champions and BOB winners in 15 breeds to be health checked
06 Jan 2011 08:03

THE KENNEL Club has announced that dogs of 15 ‘high-profile breeds’ who win best of breed at Crufts 2012 and at general and group championship shows after that will need to be given a clean bill of health by the show vet before their awards are confirmed and they are allowed to continue to compete at the show.
In addition, before the champion title of any dog or bitch within these breeds can be confirmed the dog will have to undergo the same procedure at a group or general championship show.
The move, which will become effective in March 2012, is to ensure that the breeds, ‘some of which suffer from health issues and which attract the greatest criticism, do not bring the whole hobby of dog showing into disrepute’, the KC said on Tuesday, adding: “This requirement is designed to improve canine health and protect the sport of dog showing.”
The breeds are the Basset Hound, Bloodhound, Bulldog, Chinese Crested, Chow Chow, Clumber Spaniel, Dogue de Bordeaux, French Bulldog, German Shepherd Dog, Mastiff, Neapolitan Mastiff, Pekingese, Pug, Shar-Pei and the St Bernard.

‘Chemical insults’

Vets will be looking for signs of ectropion, entropion, corneal damage, dermatitis, breathing difficulty on moderate exercise, lameness and skin disorders. With regard to the Crested, the principal issue will be the presence of skin damage arising from hair removal, and signs of clipper rash or ‘chemical insults’ to the skin. Show vets will be given clear guidelines on the issues which need to be considered before deciding whether to allow a dog to proceed in the group competition.
“The vets will be directed only to prevent dogs from going forward if they are suffering from some clinical problem which obviously adversely affects the dog’s wellbeing,” the KC said. “They will not be permitted to exclude dogs merely for aesthetic reasons or because of exaggerations alone unless these are causing the dog some adverse clinical effect on its health or welfare.
“An exploratory meeting to establish the practicalities of these issues has already been held with a number of established show vets. This has been extremely helpful to us in planning for the detailed regulations which will have to be introduced to give effect to this new requirement.”
KC chairman Ronnie Irving said: “The majority of people involved in showing dogs, including the 15 high-profile breeds, are doing a good job in moving their breed forward and many judges are ensuring that health is paramount when they judge. This work should be applauded and recognised. Sadly though, a few judges in some breeds simply can’t or won’t accept the need to eliminate from top awards, dogs which are visibly unhealthy.
“Neither we who show dogs, nor the KC which must protect our hobby, can reasonably allow that state of affairs to continue. I hope also that monitoring the results of this exercise may even, in time, enable us to drop from the high-profile list some of those breeds which prove to have a clean bill of health. This move, along with the other health measures that we have put in place will help the KC to ensure that the show ring is, as Professor Patrick Bateson said it can be: a positive lever for change in the world of dogs.”
Crufts vet Steve Dean said: “The guidance which we will issue to show vets will focus on clinical signs associated with pain or discomfort which will come under the main headings of external eye disease, lameness, skin disorders and breathing difficulty. The vet will be looking for signs such as ectropion, entropion, corneal damage, dermatitis, breathing difficulty on moderate exercise, and lameness. The 15th breed is the Chinese Crested where the principal issue will be the presence of skin damage arising from hair removal and thus signs of clipper rash or chemical insults to the skin will be looked for.
“It is not intended for the vet to act in any way as a show judge of conformation. Veterinary opinion will only lead to disqualification of a dog from further competition where there is clinical evidence of disease. Perhaps the only arguable exceptions are ectropion and entropion, as both are conformatory defects of the eyelid, but both conditions are closely associated with chronic conjunctival inflammation or corneal damage and thus they will be disqualifying signs in their own right.
“By giving dog exhibitors and judges 12 months’ notice of the intent to have a vet examine the BOB from each of the high-profile breeds we hope that judges will ensure that only healthy exhibits will come forward. Therefore, the number of times dogs are excluded from the group following veterinary examination should be minimal. For some of the breeds this will still be a huge challenge but the intent is to improve the overall health and welfare of dogs and if this measure helps achieve this then it has to be a step in the right direction.”
KC secretary Caroline Kisko said: “There are 195 breeds whose participation in the hobby of dog showing is overshadowed by the small minority of people within some high-profile breeds who seem to continue to breed, and occasionally reward, unhealthy dogs and who by so doing are bringing down the reputation of the hobby and the rest of the dog showing fraternity. We must ensure, for the future prospects of dog showing and for the good of dogs, that only healthy dogs go home from dog shows with prizes.
“This action will not only protect the reputation of the majority of dog showing people who put the health and welfare of their dogs first and foremost, but it will also continue to encourage improvement within the high-profile breeds themselves, ensuring that the healthiest are justly held up as an example for others to follow.”
The changes, which will become active from 2012, come after measures were put in place in 2009 to try to ensure that only healthy dogs are rewarded in the show ring, the KC said.
“Judges now have the power to remove dogs that look unhealthy from competition and show monitors can also ask show vets to determine whether a dog is healthy enough to continue competing,” Mrs Kisko said. These existing requirements will continue to be in place at Crufts 2011.”
Regulations to effect these new moves are being developed and will be published in due course, the KC said.

Related Blogs

Popularity: 7% [?]

New Natural Pet Care Magazine

Dogs…Naturally! is an exciting new magazine dedicated to delivering the latest information on raw feeding, vaccinations, holistic health care, behavior and training.

Dogs…Naturally! is for dog owners, breeders, trainers, health professionals, and anybody who wants to learn about the best in alternative care for their dogs.

The Goals of the new magazine are:

• Promote Natural Rearing of dogs. Natural Rearing includes avoiding vaccinations, kibble diets, chemicals and pesticides in an effort to improve the health and longevity of our dogs
• Promote alternative medicine including homeopathy, traditional chinese medicine, chiropractic, aromatherapy and more
• Promote positive and effective training methods
• Make natural care more accessible by creating a community and forum for pet owners, breeders, veterinarians, trainers, and anybody who loves dogs
• Assist readers in securing natural food, products and services by providing affordable advertising for smaller natural care businesses.

The first issue is currently FREE via digital or pdf download here

http://www.dogsnaturallymagazine.com/index.html

Looks to be a promising new magazine offering resources and education about caring for your pets naturally.

Popularity: 16% [?]

ATTN: US Dog Owners

PIJAC The Pet Industry Joint Advisory Council just unleashed it new “Don’t Mess With My Pet” campaign:

You love your pet. You take good care of your pet. How would you feel if the government tried to limit your ability to have pets in your life? …Angry? …Scared? …Betrayed? …Well, it’s happening.

Each year, local, state and federal governments propose thousands of laws that would restrict your ability to own pets – to include pets as vital members of your family. While we believe that some regulations are warranted to ensure that pets are well care for, we also believe that responsible pet ownership should be applauded, supported, and encouraged, not limited!

Unfortunately, many government officials don’t understand how their bills might affect you, the responsible pet owner. Furthermore, they may be basing their decisions on propaganda that, while it seems to call for better pet care, is actually part of an agenda to end pet ownership.

Help us protect responsible pet ownership by defending you and your pets against misdirected and poorly crafted legislation.

Support the “Don’t Mess with My Pet™” campaign by becoming a Member of the Pet Industry Joint Advisory Council (PIJAC). Your $25 contribution you will help us guard responsible pet ownership…on behalf of you and your non-human family members. As a thank you from us, you’ll receive a free campaign t-shirt.

Popularity: 15% [?]

Modern Molosser – New Magazine

A new magazine hits the market this Summer, MODERN MOLOSSER, debut issue featuring the DOGUE DE BORDEAUX.

“This 100-page issue is filled with authoritative stories and features on those imposing breeds known throughout antiquity as the Molossers.“

The website promises future issues about other Molossers such as the  Cane corso, Neapolitan Mastiff, Tibetan Mastiff, Rottweiler and more.

Published quarterly for $60 US subscriptions, $65 Canada.

Visit Modern Molosser for more info.

Popularity: 30% [?]

Warning about Pet Food “Evangers”

From the FDA’s Center for Veterinary Medicine:

FDA Suspends Temporary Emergency Permit of Pet Food Maker

June 12, 2009

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration announced today it was suspending the temporary Emergency Permit issued to Evanger’s Dog & Cat Food Co., Inc.

Evanger’s, operating in Wheeling, Illinois, deviated from the prescribed process, equipment, product shipment, and recordkeeping requirements in the production of the company’s thermally processed low acid canned food (LACF) products. The deviations in their processes and documentation could result in under-processed pet foods, which can allow the survival and growth of Clostridium botulinum (C. botulinum), a bacterium that causes botulism in some animals as well as in humans.

In April 2008, Evanger’s was issued an “Order of Need for Emergency Permit” after the agency determined that the company had failed to meet the regulatory requirements to process a product that does not present a health risk. In June, 2008, FDA issued Evanger’s a temporary Emergency Permit. During inspections conducted between March 2009 and April 2009, FDA determined Evanger’s was not operating in compliance with the mandatory requirements and conditions of the Temporary Emergency Permit.

“The FDA is stopping Evanger’s ability to ship pet food in interstate commerce,” said Dr. Bernadette Dunham. “Today’s enforcement action sends a strong message to manufacturers of pet food that we will take whatever action necessary to keep unsafe products from reaching consumers.”

In order for Evanger’s to resume shipping in interstate commerce, the company must document that corrective actions and processing procedures have been implemented to ensure that the finished product will not present a health hazard.

Botulism is a powerful toxin that affects the nervous system and can be fatal. The disease has been documented in dogs and cats. Signs of botulism in animals are progressive muscle paralysis, disturbed vision, difficulty in chewing and swallowing, and progressive weakness to the body. Death is usually due to paralysis of the heart or the muscles used in breathing.

While FDA’s Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition is responsible for regulating all human and animal LACF processing, FDA’s Center for Veterinary Medicine has authority over animal feed and foods. The two centers are collaborating on this enforcement action.

Popularity: 32% [?]

PetAirways Now Taking Reservations!

We blogged about Pet Airways when they first launched their site and now it’s official! Pet Airways is now in the air and taking reservations !

Service from LA, New York and Chicago for as low as $149 one way!

Check out the new Pet Airways Commercial:

I think a pet only airline is simply brilliant but I also want to point out that many airlines do transport pets in a very safe and effective manner. The video makes it look like all airlines treat pets like baggage. I have shipped dogs for many years now and know that airlines such as Continental, Alaska and Northwest Airlines have gone to great lengths to improve and ensure the safety of animals in their charge. Continental airlines has recently built a 24 hour veterinary clinic at their hub in Dallas to treat, monitor and overnight board animals in their care!

Of course no airline can cater exclusively to pets unless they are a “pet only airline” but other arlines are doing a good job….but if Pet Airways is flying where I need then of course I am choosing them !

Popularity: 34% [?]

Cesar Milan Under Attack ?

Several weeks ago we blogged about the Ian Dunbar’s article denounces Pack Theory and Off-lead’s report of the lack of pack behavior in free roaming dogs in Romania. It seems the Pack Theory is under further attack this month by the The American Veterinary Society of Animal Behavior (AVSAB) who issued a statement “

The AVSAB recommends that veterinarians not refer clients to trainers or behavior consultants who coach and advocate dominance hierarchy theory and the subsequent confrontational training that follows from it”

Reported over at VIN, the AVSAB’s executive board also stated that the statement was clearly issued against Cesar Milan.

As usual these groups are over reacting, yes there are con’s involved with Pack Behavior Theory and there are advantages as well.

Cesar is an incredible trainer and no amount of their slander can detract from that fact. Is his training modality fit for every dog ? No. Is his training theory 100% accepted by every trainer? No. But for the dog’s that it does work for in many cases it is a life saver, literally.

Cesar uses a blend of pack behavior theory and positive rewards, all trainers should have a blend of training theories because not every dog or dog owner learns the same way nor do all dogs respond the same.

Instead of demonizing or abolishing training modalities based on pack behavior perhaps the American Veterinary Society of Animal Behavior should outline the numerous k-9 training theories offering a comparative analysis of the theories without negatively impacting any of them but instead helping trainers and owners understand that each “school of training” has valuable tools that can be used at various times.

Keep up the good work Cesar !

Popularity: 42% [?]

Child and Dog Safety

Children and dogs often have a difficult time establishing a healthy relationship, injuries are common to both puppies and children from inappropriate play and/or contact. The Blue Dog project was designed by a team of veterinarians, child psychologists, pediatricians and more in the United Kingdom.

The Blue Dog project is a series of interactive games and cartoons to illustrate a safe relationship between children and dogs. The project is available in a variety of languages, outside the US you can purchase directly from The Blue Dog Project and within the US you can order via the American Veterinarian Medical Association for a mere $8 !

The Blue Dog website also has a variety of online activities, the project is geared toward children between 3 and 6 years of age.

A must have for parents with small children and a Neapolitan Mastiff !

Great site and project, Kudo’s to the UK development team !

Popularity: 29% [?]

Pack Behavior Pop Psychology

Another interesting article in the Winter Edition of Off-Lead magazine, Ian Dunbar sounds off about pack behavior based training modalities.

“Entire training programs have advocated that people pretend to be an alpha wolf or the dog’s mother when raising puppies or educating dogs. Although ludicrous, pop psychology has always been like catnip for a surprisingly large number of dog owners (and some trainers)”

Mr. Dunbar does an excellent job of explaining why single action temperament testing is “a few steps below asinine” and that assigning a label to a dog based off his one reaction to one event is a fallacy. The article also provides an excellent overview of the importance of early socialization and the effects of no socialization.

The article lists a few excellent resources:

• Dogstardaily.com – Practical puppy husbandry and dog training
• Free Behavior Blueprint’s from Sirius Training

This is the second issue in which Off-Lead has challenged the widely accepted “pack theory”, a few weeks ago we blogged about their fall issue article titled Pack of Lies. Although no “TV Trainers” were named directly, a few times in the article I couldn’t help but think he was directing his statements to a couple famous TV Trainers

Popularity: 24% [?]

Chicken Jerky Warning

Preliminary Animal Health Notification

December 19, 2008

FDA Continues To Receive Complaints about Chicken Jerky Products for Dogs and Cautions Consumers

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) continues to caution consumers of a potential association between the development of illness in dogs and the consumption of chicken jerky products also described as chicken tenders, strips or treats.  FDA continues to receive complaints of dogs experiencing illness that their owners or veterinarians associate with consumption of chicken jerky products. The chicken jerky products are imported to the U.S. from China.  FDA issued a cautionary warning to consumers in September 2007.

Australian news organizations report the University of Sydney is also investigating an association between illness in dogs and the consumption of chicken jerky in Australia. At least one firm in Australia has recalled their chicken jerky product and the recall notification stated the chicken jerky product was manufactured in China.

FDA believes the continued trend of consumer complaints coupled with the information obtained from Australia warrants an additional reminder and animal health notification.

Chicken jerky products should not be substituted for a balanced diet and are intended to be
used occasionally and in small quantities.  Owners of small dogs must be especially careful to limit the amount of these products.

FDA, in addition to several veterinary diagnostic laboratories in the U.S, is working to determine why these products are associated with illness in dogs.   To date, scientists have not been able to determine a definitive cause for the reported illnesses.  FDA has conducted extensive chemical and microbial testing but has not identified any contaminant.

FDA is advising consumers who choose to feed their dogs chicken jerky products to watch their dogs closely for any or all of the following signs which may occur within hours to days of feeding the product: decreased appetite, although some may continue to consume the treats to the exclusion of other foods; decreased activity; vomiting; diarrhea, sometimes with blood; and increased water consumption and/or increased urination.  If the dog shows any of these signs, stop feeding the chicken jerky product.  Owners should consult their veterinarian if signs are severe or persist for more than 24 hours.  Blood tests may indicate kidney failure (increased urea nitrogen and creatinine).  Urine tests may indicate Fanconi syndrome (increased glucose). Although most dogs appear to recover, some reports to the FDA have involved dogs that have died.

The FDA continues to actively investigate the problem.  Many of the illnesses reported may be the result of causes other than eating chicken jerky.  Veterinarians and consumers alike should report cases of animal illness associated with pet foods to the FDA Consumer Complaint Coordinator http://www.fda.gov/opacom/backgrounders/complain.html in their state.

Popularity: 25% [?]